Endtimewatchman wrote:Jim wrote:I'm going to start posting in here ... so give me a bit, had a bad day :( I want people to post in here that are lurking in the background too. If I wind up talking to myself, I'm going to pull the topic.
I'm here.
Seems to be you and me to start LOL. 
OK ...
I have come to the insurmountable conclusion that people in the UFO community do NOT try to open this picture up because they are afraid. I base this on a continual approach to SAFE topics, like sightings and crop circles and what-have-you. If you try to steer them out of the mud, they run right back into it. At this point I don't know what to say except that it's your life, if you want to live in a fog be my guest. I have looked at this picture for 36 years, along with connected data in history. I have failed, gotten up again, gone down wrong roads, came back, and the bottom line is that I loved every minute of it no matter WHAT was going on (and I have literally been to hell and back in this).
What I plan to do is mark a beginning point. Based on a comment from someone who told me that UFOs have been around longer than that, and I agree, I need to say that this is a created starting point of contact, based on two ideas:
1) this point is a time when it seems UFOs actually got into our faces.
2) At the time this happened, the " constellation sky pattern" I keep referring to was present.
These 3 constellations were Virgo, Leo, and Orion. Archeological data puts a first reference to these constellations at about 32,000 BC, with a goddess / Virgo connection about 40,000 BC, and an anomaly that goes back 200,000+ years. The anomaly (the earliest goddess carvings) is still debated and one day we will know for sure. The carvings added to the goddess carvings are of Leo (the standing lion) and Orion carvings.
The idea is, that UFOs may have been around for a LONG time ... but this is the first time that they actually got in our faces. We are going to figure out why. Now, I did my homework and it's going to be up to you to come up with a counter argument or a complete agreement. So, as far as I am concerned, the so-called Battle of LA is where this picture begins. The background "sky" at that time is the exact same sky that has been popping up in this subject, and I believe that is a connection too. TPTB of the time gave their story, and others have said no based on a scrutiny of the picture. You need to look into this and post your feelings on it. We have new members in here, and I would like to see some new views.
Rense has a good article here, you can Google others too.
www.rense.com/ufo/battleofla.htm
"...men are not so far from the truth as they generally believe. Their greatest error is in searching for it where it is not, and in attaching it to forms; whereas, they ought, on the contrary, to avoid form in order to dwell upon the essence." Fabre D'Olivet
Rather than STOP and say, 'Woops! I'm headed in the wrong direction,’ we tend to place a premium on projecting a consistent image of ourselves and try to rationalize our initial decision despite increasing evidence suggesting we ought to do the contrary. B M Staw
… many people today don't want honest answers insofar as 'honest’ means 'unpleasant’ or 'disturbing.’ They want a soft answer that turneth away anxiety. — Louis Kronenberger
Man prefers to believe what he prefers to be true. — Francis Bacon
"How to teach again, however, what has been taught correctly and incorrectly learned a thousand thousand times, throughout the millenniums of mankind's prudent folly." ... "The easy thing is to commit the whole community to the devil and retire again into the heavenly rock dwelling, close the door, and make it fast." — Joseph Campbell
